Make environmental evidence part of the design pathway.

Dromo coordinates its circuit-design and specialist-engineering inputs with the environmental assessment and permitting pathway appropriate to the project, jurisdiction and statutory roles. The objective is to keep geometry, construction, event operation, mitigation and verification aligned while design options can still change.

Dromo does not present an authority’s environmental decision, or third-party submissions in a public administrative file, as its own findings. Each source is identified by role and used as traceable evidence of the questions the project had to answer.

The official SEA 67/24 decision links the environmental route to the treatment of acoustic-quality limits and to a wider set of project conditions. It does not erase environmental responsibility: it converts the approved route into a defined programme of controls, authorisations and follow-up.

The decision requires event-by-event checks of external noise emissions, a complaints and noise-minimisation plan, environmental and incident registers, periodic compliance reporting and external noise controls by an accredited inspection entity. It also addresses water, drainage, vegetation, landscape restoration, waste, contamination risk, cultural heritage and emergency response.

The public administrative dossier also contains critical third-party submissions concerning noise, mobility and environmental effects. Those submissions are relevant evidence of scrutiny, but they are not represented here as the authority’s adopted findings.